03
Aug 09Law and order.
Radley Balko linked a great Popular Mechanics article on the dubious accuracy of forensics:
On television and in the movies, forensic examiners unravel difficult cases with a combination of scientific acumen, cutting-edge technology and dogged persistence. The gee-whiz wonder of it all has spawned its own media-age legal phenomenon known as the “CSI effect.” Jurors routinely afford confident scientific experts an almost mythic infallibility because they evoke the bold characters from crime dramas. The real world of forensic science, however, is far different. America’s forensic labs are overburdened, understaffed and under intense pressure from prosecutors to produce results. According to a 2005 study by the Department of Justice, the average lab has a backlog of 401 requests for services. Plus, several state and city forensic departments have been racked by scandals involving mishandled evidence and outright fraud.
There’s no reason to trust the police one iota more than you would trust a complete stranger, and there’s every reason to put very severe restrictions on what we consider “evidence.”
Tagged: civil liberty, nerdiness, news, politics, reading