antimeria

a complete impediment to understanding

Tag: free speech

Freedom from the press.

If you’re interested in the still-unfolding Gitmo trials, the Washington Independent‘s Spencer Ackerman’s reporting has been solid (his blogging is also very good). Today, he reports that the Pentagon has banned four journalists who best understand the tribunal process:

While the judge in the case, Col. Patrick Parrish, issued an admonition yesterday for reporters to respect the anonymity of the classified witnesses, he did not rule that any reporter here had violated the protected order. The decision to block the four reporters from returning to Guantanamo Bay is a matter of policy from the Office of the Secretary of Defense. And those four are not the only ones within the press corps here to have reported Interrogator #1’s name.

Those four reporters comprise much of the institutional knowledge of Guantanamo Bay and the military commissions, as their colleagues widely acknowledge. Shephard has written the most comprehensive account to date of Omar Khadr’s life and experiences in detention at Bagram and Guantanamo Bay, in both her Star reporting and her book Guantanamo’s Child. Rosenberg is the single most diligent, consistent and experienced Guantanamo Bay reporter in the world, having carved out the Guantanamo beat steadily almost since the detention facility here opened in 2002 and traveled here more frequently than any other journalist. (I personally heard complaints about her from public affairs officers here five years ago — and those complaints amounted to whining about how dogged an investigator she was.) Koring and Edwards have also been invaluable resources about Khadr and Guantanamo to their colleagues these past two weeks.

Whether or not this was just a pretext for dumping nosy reporters, this is the kind of little impropriety that undermines faith in the process.

Google: (mostly) not evil.

Google has removed its filters on Google.cn, its China portal, due to “a highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China.” The upshot, of course, is this:

Google’s action and accompanying blog post strongly suggests that they believe the hack was directed by the Chinese government:

We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that “we will carefully monitor conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China.”

These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered–combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web–have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China.

You could argue that not having a presence in China, even a censored one, would ultimately contribute to the government’s stranglehold on the people, given that the Green Dam and Great Firewall (which, as far as I know, still doesn’t care for yours truly) are still standing tall, but I commend Google’s willingness to take a stand, especially considering the money they could have made in China.

Thanks to BB, Erin, and everyone else who highlighted the story.

Are you taking notes, Pastor Fatback?

I’m not sure I agree that Rev. Lowry’s benediction outshone Obama, but there were some pretty stunning moments. As I’ve said before, I’m a pretty staunch atheist, but damn, that prayer was everything I could’ve asked for. The opening and closing grafs are particularly good:

God of our weary years, God of our silent tears, thou who has brought us thus far along the way, thou who has by thy might led us into the light, keep us forever in the path, we pray, lest our feet stray from the places, our God, where we met thee, lest our hearts, drunk with the wine of the world, we forget thee. Shadowed beneath thy hand may we forever stand — true to thee, O God, and true to our native land.
[...]
Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get back, when brown can stick around — (laughter) — when yellow will be mellow — (laughter) — when the red man can get ahead, man — (laughter) — and when white will embrace what is right.

Let all those who do justice and love mercy say amen.

AUDIENCE: Amen!

REV. LOWERY: Say amen –

AUDIENCE: Amen!

REV. LOWERY: — and amen.

AUDIENCE: Amen!

The comments, predictably, are less enlightened.

Maryland Police: “I spy, with my little eye…”

Over the last few days, the ACLU has revealed a scenario familiar to anyone who lived through the Vietnam War: police spying on “peace activists and anti-death penalty groups,” and then labelling them as “people thought to be terrorists or drug traffickers.” The operations, which stretched over at least 288 hours of surveillance during 14 months, failed to produce “criminal or even potentially criminal acts, the legal standard for initiating such surveillance” (HT: The Sun). Three of the targeted groups were the Baltimore Pledge of Resistance, “formed for individuals willing to engage in nonviolent civil disobedience to protest an invasion of Iraq [link]“; the Baltimore Coalition Against the Death Penalty; and the Committee to Save Vernon Evans, a “gathering of Baltimore organizations and individuals working against the death penalty and in support of [death row inmate] Vernon Evans” [link].1 In response, Maryland State Police superintendent Colonel Terrence Sheridan released a statement, claiming “No illegal actions by state police have ever been taken against any citizens or groups who have exercised their right to free speech and assembly in a lawful manner. … Only when information regarding criminal activity is alleged will police continue to investigate leads to ensure the public safety.”

Sheridan’s claim smells fishy. In fact, it stinks. Even assuming that the MSP had something resembling a good reason to investigate these groups, instead of reducing the nation’s highest per-capita murder rate, reports like “The meeting concluded with members talking about trying to get the man running for Baltimore County State’s Attorney to commit to his plans regarding the death penalty in the county” don’t warrant 14 months of “just being really sure.” A former FBI agent specializing in counter-terrorism said that the government has “actively encouraged” law enforcement to spy on groups and organizations, no pesky connection to terrorism necessary; information on these super-high-value targets was shared with the National Security Agency, the police departments of Baltimore, Baltimore County, Annapolis and Anne Arundel County, and the state General Services police.

Naturally, as soon as the story broke, everyone ran for cover. Less than a week after claiming his police had only investigated alleged criminal activity, Sheridan claimed that he’d learned of the operation only recently, saying that “It shouldn’t have gone on so long, and there’s no reason for it.” A recently-retired police captain whom Sheridan threw to the wolves named as involved in the operation was obligingly belligerent, arguing that “Collecting information about what you’re up against is a normal process”; when asked why the operation had continued for 14 months, he replied “I’m not in a position to respond to that.” Add this to the backdrop of questionable crime statistics, reports of police antagonizing victims and an ACLU/NAACP lawsuit alleging illegal arrests. Still, feel better, Baltimore–you have Col. Sheridan’s word that spying on law-abiding citizens “will not be occurring in the future.”

1. Tangent: Check out Meet Vernon, a blog run by Virginia Simmons “to allow you to meet Vernon Lee Evans, the next person to be executed on Maryland’s death row.” Evans was sentenced to death after his state-appointed attorney failed to call any witnesses, including the crime’s only eyewitness, claiming she “slipped through the cracks.” Read more details on the Meet Vernon about page.